Wednesday, October 17, 2012
Jury refuses to convict predator father who groomed daughter during visitation (Hollidaysburg, Pennsylvania)
We still live in a world where the word of men is privileged over the word of "mere" women and children. Notice that this f***ing pervert ADMITTED that he bought his daughter a vibrator, but then denied (LIED about) his daughter's other accusations--that he had given her drugs, forced her to pornography, and tried to sexually assault her.
And of course the jury chose to go with Daddy's bullsh**. The daughter's story is far more credible, but whatever. Believe a freaking creepster instead.
And notice that this all started over DADDY'S WEEKEND VISITATION, when, obviously, the mother wouldn't be around to ruin his opportunity. This is, unfortunately, very, very typical of perverts. Sexual abuse is very much a crime of opportunity. That's why pedophiles and sexual predators fight so hard for custody and visitation.
UNNAMED DAD
http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/565179/Dad-cleared-in-vibrator-case.html?nav=742
Dad cleared in vibrator case
October 17, 2012
By Kay Stephens, The Altoona Mirror
HOLLIDAYSBURG - The Hollidaysburg-area father who told a jury that he bought a vibrator for his then-13-year-old daughter was cleared Tuesday of all criminal charges, including dissemination of sex material to a minor.
To reach a guilty verdict on that charge, the jury needed to conclude that the vibrator fit the legal definition of obscene material. After hearing Senior Judge Thomas G. Peoples read the applicable law for the second time, the jury concluded that it didn't.
"It was the right decision," defense attorney Mark Zearfaus said. "Sex toys are not illegal. It may not be advisable to buy one for a teenager, but it's not a crime."
The jury of seven women and five men also acquitted the father on a second charge of disseminating sex material to a minor, based on the daughter's accusation that they watched pornographic movies, and on additional charges of endangering the welfare of a child, corruption of minors and indecent assault.
The Mirror is not identifying the father and the daughter, now 16, to protect the girl's identity.
Assistant District Attorney Dan Kiss said the charges were based on the father's behavior which developed over several months after the daughter began staying with him on weekends in late 2009.
"This man groomed his young daughter to be sexually molested," Kiss said.
The father, he said, presented his daughter with pornography, allowed her to smoke cigarettes and marijuana, bought her a vibrator, then asked for oral sex. Their relationship ended, Kiss said, when the daughter rejected those advances.
The father, who took the witness stand Monday, denied his daughter's accusations. He said he purchased the vibrator after the daughter made repeated requests and told him she feared that she might resume cutting herself intentionally.
The father said he made the purchase after reading about a 2009 episode of "Oprah" where Dr. Laura Berman advised parents to consider purchasing vibrators for their teenagers.
And of course the jury chose to go with Daddy's bullsh**. The daughter's story is far more credible, but whatever. Believe a freaking creepster instead.
And notice that this all started over DADDY'S WEEKEND VISITATION, when, obviously, the mother wouldn't be around to ruin his opportunity. This is, unfortunately, very, very typical of perverts. Sexual abuse is very much a crime of opportunity. That's why pedophiles and sexual predators fight so hard for custody and visitation.
UNNAMED DAD
http://www.altoonamirror.com/page/content.detail/id/565179/Dad-cleared-in-vibrator-case.html?nav=742
Dad cleared in vibrator case
October 17, 2012
By Kay Stephens, The Altoona Mirror
HOLLIDAYSBURG - The Hollidaysburg-area father who told a jury that he bought a vibrator for his then-13-year-old daughter was cleared Tuesday of all criminal charges, including dissemination of sex material to a minor.
To reach a guilty verdict on that charge, the jury needed to conclude that the vibrator fit the legal definition of obscene material. After hearing Senior Judge Thomas G. Peoples read the applicable law for the second time, the jury concluded that it didn't.
"It was the right decision," defense attorney Mark Zearfaus said. "Sex toys are not illegal. It may not be advisable to buy one for a teenager, but it's not a crime."
The jury of seven women and five men also acquitted the father on a second charge of disseminating sex material to a minor, based on the daughter's accusation that they watched pornographic movies, and on additional charges of endangering the welfare of a child, corruption of minors and indecent assault.
The Mirror is not identifying the father and the daughter, now 16, to protect the girl's identity.
Assistant District Attorney Dan Kiss said the charges were based on the father's behavior which developed over several months after the daughter began staying with him on weekends in late 2009.
"This man groomed his young daughter to be sexually molested," Kiss said.
The father, he said, presented his daughter with pornography, allowed her to smoke cigarettes and marijuana, bought her a vibrator, then asked for oral sex. Their relationship ended, Kiss said, when the daughter rejected those advances.
The father, who took the witness stand Monday, denied his daughter's accusations. He said he purchased the vibrator after the daughter made repeated requests and told him she feared that she might resume cutting herself intentionally.
The father said he made the purchase after reading about a 2009 episode of "Oprah" where Dr. Laura Berman advised parents to consider purchasing vibrators for their teenagers.