Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Japan. Show all posts

Saturday, September 12, 2015

Dad, stepdads behind record high child abuse in Japan, 80% of cases involved violent assault, including 8 deaths (Tokyo, Japan)

"Fathers accounted for the largest number of abusers the police took action against, totaling 172, followed by mothers at 83 and stepfathers at 67."

So in other words, mothers represented just 25% of the abusive parents, though mothers represent the vast majority of parents doing day-to-day caretaking.

Japan has been under tremendous international pressure from fathers rights groups to adopt the Hague Convention and "modernize" their child custody laws, which have traditionally favored mothers. Perhaps we are seeing the fall out from that....

http://www.japantoday.com/category/crime/view/no-of-child-abuse-cases-in-1st-half-of-2015-hit-record-high

No. of child abuse cases in 1st half of 2015 hit record high


TOKYO —
The number of child abuse cases in which the Japanese police took action in the first half of 2015 rose to a record 376, with more than 80% involving violent assault, including eight cases that led to the death of the victims, a police survey showed Thursday.

The biannual survey was compiled at a time when the increase in child abuse has become a social issue, with the arrest of household members, often parents, becoming more frequently reported.

In February alone, a 36-year-old mother in Chiba Prefecture was arrested on suspicion of killing her daughters aged one and four, citing her “fatigue” over childrearing, while a 36-year-old father in Osaka was arrested on suspicion of killing his six-month-old son.

Several other mothers and fathers were arrested for assaulting their kids in that month.

In the January-June period, the number of people the police suspect of having abused children aged below 18 increased to 387 and the number of child victims rose to 386, both the highest figures since comparable data became available in 2000, the survey showed.

“Abusive behavior often occurs in a place hidden from the outside, such as at home, so we will tackle the issue by cooperating with relevant organizations,” said an official of the National Police Agency.

By type of abusive behavior, the number of cases involving physical assault rose by 79 from a year earlier to 307, accounting for 81.6% of the acknowledged child abuse cases in the six-month period. Of those cases, the number of attempted murders increased by 12 to 28, including eight cases of death.

The number of sexual abuse cases fell by 20 to 58 and that of neglecting to offer basic care to children such as feeding fell by five to one. But the number of cases of psychological abuse, including threatening with knives, rose by five to 10.

Fathers accounted for the largest number of abusers the police took action against, totaling 172, followed by mothers at 83 and stepfathers at 67.

In the period covered, the police reported possible abuse cases regarding a record 17,224 children to child counseling centers, up 32.1%, with about 65 percent of them suspected to have been suffering from psychological abuse, including shock from seeing acts of domestic violence between parents.



Monday, December 30, 2013

Dad in "divorce mediation" douses 9-year-old son in kerosene and burns him to death in murder-suicide (Tokyo, Japan)

FRs will tell you how sorry they are for the poor oppressed daddy. They'll tell you the solution is more contact. In reality, the solution is NO CONTACT for nutcase pyromaniacs and killer daddies. No contact with the child=no opportunity to murder them.

UNNAMED DAD

http://the-japan-news.com/news/article/0000906377

Boy dies in likely murder-suicide

December 30, 2014

The Yomiuri Shimbun

A 9-year-old boy has died in what police believe was a murder-suicide in which his father set him on fire, according to the police.

The 49-year-old father came for his second son, who was practicing baseball on the grounds of Shiomi Elementary School in Bunkyo Ward, Tokyo, at about 10:30 a.m. on Dec. 23. He took his son to the side of a school building, where he poured what appeared to be kerosene on himself and set himself on fire.

The man died soon after, and his son suffered severe burns.

According to Komagome Police Station, it is highly likely that the man also poured the kerosene-like liquid on his son, judging from the nature of the boy’s injuries. The police will send the case to the public prosecutors office as a murder, even though the suspect has died.

The man was going through court-mediated divorce proceedings with his wife, and the boy was living apart from his father.

Wednesday, December 25, 2013

Dad arrested in deaths of twin infant girls (Nagoya, Japan)

Dad is identified as KAZUYA SUZUKI. No mention of a mother in this home. Was there one?

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/12/06/national/nagoya-father-arrested-after-second-twin-baby-dies-violence-suspected/#.Uru0Jtco7mI

Nagoya father arrested after second twin baby dies; violence suspected

Dec 6, 2013

NAGOYA – A man from Toyohashi, Aichi Prefecture, was arrested Friday for allegedly inflicting bodily injury resulting in the death of the youngest of his three daughters in July 2012, police said.

Kazuya Suzuki, 33, a company worker from the Nishi Miyuki-cho district, was arrested on suspicion of harming the 7-month-old girl at their home. The victim, named Mirea, was the youngest of twins.

The police allege Suzuki hurt the girl by either vigorously shaking her or slamming her into something, which resulted in several head injuries, including acute subdural hematoma, considered the deadliest of head injuries. The child, who was taken to a hospital after the incident, died the next month.

Suzuki has denied battering or shaking the girl.

The girl’s twin sister, meanwhile, died in July this year, the police said. They are investigating the case based on allegations that she also was subjected to physical abuse.

The police believe both twins died from “shaken baby syndrome” that also resulted in severe brain injury.

Shaken baby syndrome is a form of child abuse caused by forcefully and violently shaking a child’s body. Because an infant’s brain is not fully developed and the violent movement pitches the brain back and forth within the skull, it can destroy brain cells and in extreme cases result in death.

Suzuki’s twins were hospitalized in February 2012 after their health condition had worsened due to cold. The older twin was diagnosed with brain damage during hospitalization in 2012 and was pronounced dead this July after being transferred to a hospital in Hamamatsu, Shizuoka Prefecture. Police speculate that Suzuki might have abused the older twin during her stay in the hospital.

The younger of the two, meanwhile, was released from the hospital after treatment, but she was then taken to a hospital in Toyohashi a second time in July 2012.

Friday, October 25, 2013

Custodial dad arrested for beating death of 2-year-old son (Wakayama, Japan)

For a time, Japan had a reputation as the last hold out in terms of countries/societies that favored mothers as the natural caretakers of children. Because of this, they have been targeted by the international fathers rights crowd for "reforms," such as forcing Japan to sign on the the Hague Convention. 

Now we see the logical results of that about face. Which is that violent, manipulative fathers like KAZUKI HARA get custody, with the mother "disappearing"--at least from official sight. Meanwhile, the child protective agencies, newly brainwashed in Father Exaltation Ideology (Every child needs a father! Fathers can do no wrong!), ignore/deny all evidence of child abuse. A month and a half after Daddy gets full custody back, Daddy kills the boy. 

Same pattern we see in so many places now....

Right down to a total lack of curiosity as to what happened to the mother. How much do you want to bet that she was beaten as well? The main (unanswered) question here is what happened to her. Did Daddy kill her--and hide the body well? Maybe that's why she's "missing." Or did she flee for her life? Or did Daddy strip her of custody through official channels? 

http://japandailypress.com/man-arrested-for-allegedly-beating-to-death-2-year-old-son-2438474/

Man arrested for allegedly beating to death 2-year-old son

Oct 24, 2013 Ida Torres

Man arrested for allegedly beating to death 2-year-old son

A man has been arrested for allegedly beating his young son to death in Wakayama. 26-year-old Kazuki Hara has finally been taken into custody several months after the boy died from a subarachnoid hemorrhage he suffered during an attack allegedly committed by his father.

A spokesperson for the child welfare agency that took care of the boy since 2011 said that the then 2-year-old Seri was brought to their attention after his father repeatedly stomped on him which led to several of his bones to be broken. The District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Wakayama however could not find any hard evidence to directly link Hara to the attack and so they had to settle for a suspension of indictment.

During this time, when the child was still under the care of the welfare agency, he and his father met 25 times and he even stayed over at his father’s house 35 times. Eventually, they decided to return Seri to his father June of this year after judging it was actually safe for the two of them to live together unsupervised. But if the child abuse allegations are true, then this was a horrible mistake on their part as the boy died just a month and a half later. Hara has so far denied that he had any intent to kill or even injure his son. There was no mention if the mother of the boy was alive or in any way still part of their lives.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Dad stabs to death two children (Hiroshima, Japan)

UNNAMED DAD

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2013-05/14/c_132380817.htm

Children stabbed to death by father in Hiroshima, Japan

  English.news.cn 2013-05-14 10:40:59

OSAKA, May 14 (Xinhua) -- Two children were stabbed to death by their father early Tuesday morning in the western Japanese prefecture of Hiroshima according to local press.

The knife attack happened at around 2 a.m. local time when two children, 13-year-old son and 17-year-old daughter, were fatally stabbed by their father in a house in Mihara City of the prefecture, and emergency ambulance teams carried the two children to a local hospital where they were confirmed dead, the daily Asahi Shimbun said.

The report also cited local police officials as saying that the 49-year-old father has been treated for serious injuries after he also stabbed himself in the stomach with a sword whose total length is 30 cm, adding that the father would attempt suicide with his children.

The police are expected to start their investigation after the man recovers from his injuries.

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Dad bites and kills own son for being "possessed by a snake" (Japan)

One of our odder killer daddy stories. Dad is identified as KATSUMI NAGAYA. 

http://en.rocketnews24.com/2013/01/21/father-bites-and-kills-own-son-for-being-possessed-by-a-snake/

Father Bites and Kills Own Son for Being “Possessed by a Snake”

Jan 21, 2013 by Master Blaster

Okazaki City, Aichi Prefecture was the site of a bizarre death of 23 year-old Takuya Nagaya at the hands his father, Katsumi Nagaya. The victim was repeatedly assaulted including bites before succumbing to injuries.

The father having been arrested on suspicion of assault had said “I did it to drive out the snake that had possessed him.”

Takuya, who lives in nearby Anjo City was at his parents’ home in the early morning of 18 January. From then until the same evening he was repeatedly attacked by various means such as head-butting and biting.

After falling limp he was taken to hospital where he later died.

According to the police investigation, while Takuya was at the parents’ home he began acting violent and erratic saying things such as “I am a snake.” The mother was worried and called Katsumi to help. 

Then, as the suspect admitted in a police statement, he began beating his son in an effort to eliminate the snake from his mind.

A trial is yet to be set but it seems likely the suspect’s mental health will have to be examined before proceeding.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Custodial dad arrested for being a pimp; who were the mothers of these children and what happened to them? (Brooklyn, New York)

UPDATE: Yup, Daddy is a trafficker. See article in the Gothamist on "Asian Fetish" pimp. The Gothamist still won't connect the dots in terms of coercive violence and child custody though.
=========
That generic reporters are ignorant is bad enough. But this is a site that presumably caters to moms. And STILL the story is messed up entirely and treated as comic relief. 

It's not funny in the slightest.

Read this carefully. Dad WILLIAM THOMAS apparently had CUSTODY of his two youngest kids (He had four altogether, with three different women.) We finally hear it mentioned--strictly in passing--that the non-custodial mother of the youngest child "appears to have left the family to move back to Japan for some reason." Appears?? You mean, you don't know for sure? And moved that far away "for some reason"? You mean, you don't know why? Lazy, lazy reporting. 

Let's see. Dad runs four brothels and it appears that Mom is Japanese. It doesn't even occur to anybody that she may have been the victim of sex trafficking? Or violence? Daddy was already in arrears on child support, apparently for the older kids. He certainly had the motivation to strip this mother of her child and have her deported. Or fleeing back to her own country for her own personal safety. Really, nobody thinks a pimp is capable of such acts? That his "line of work" is merely embarrassing?

Apparently the Japanese woman is not the mother of the other child that lives with Daddy. We don't bother to find out anything about her. Another mom who just up and left the country "for some reason"?

And it doesn't even occur to anybody that these children are at high risk of sexual abuse and being trafficked themselves? 

http://thestir.cafemom.com/teen/145566/dad_of_4_arrested_for

Dad of 4 Arrested for Being a Pimp Is Most Embarrassing Parent on the Planet

Posted by Adriana Velez on October 23, 2012 at 2:14 PM

A Brooklyn father was arrested for running four brothels in New York City this month. Four, count 'em, four brothels. I know we like entrepreneurs in this country, but wow ... William Thomas lived a quiet life with his two youngest kids in an apartment across from a leafy park in a middle-class neighborhood. His arrest came as a huge surprise to everyone who knew him.

Thomas is the father of four kids by three different mothers: A 1-year-old, a 3-year-old, and two teens. I feel for all these kids, but especially for Thomas' teenagers. They're old enough to know what "brothel" means. Did they have a clue that their dad, a former IT specialist who started out in a nice, big house in the 'burbs, was allegedly a pimp?

"Awesome dad! way to make the thomas family proud," the New York Post reports Thomas' 11th-grade son tweeted. "Pretty surreal to hear your dad’s name on the news in connection to a massive prostitution ring bust. had to happen eventually i guess #meh," he added. I guess it's legal to republish the tweets of a minor who is not a public figure -- honestly, it kind of makes me squirm, which is why I'm not linking back to his Twitter account or mentioning his first name. But these quotes say it all: The sarcastic bravado used to cloak a kid's shame and embarrassment.

Thomas has already been through two divorces, and the mother of his youngest child appears to have left the family to move back to Japan for some reason. Who knows how a guy gets into the brothel biz. But it's got to be humiliating for the two oldest kids to have their dad tied with a prostitution ring.

Whether or not you think prostitution should be legalized, it's still a profession with sleazy reputation, and even in liberal New York City, it would carry a stigma. On top of that, their dad has been accused of a crime. Of course, it could turn out that the police have the wrong guy! Thomas may be totally innocent of the charges.

But for now his poor kids have to live in the shadow of this alleged crime, and that sucks for them. I'm sure Thomas was justifying what he did in order to support his family (-ish, the Post reports he was $100,000 behind in child support payments). But I wish he'd thought about the potential emotional impact on his kids if he ever got caught.

How do you think William Thomas' kids feel right now?

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Mothers make case against Hague Treaty (Japan)

I am so happy to see that Japanese moms are speaking out on this issue. Until now, the fathers rights people have dominated all the debate on the Hague treaty and international kidnapping. Anyone else has been drowned out. When ABC recently did a show on "kidnapping parents" (mothers), they ONLY addressed Japan--one of the few countries (if not the only only country) that still respects "tender years" doctrine (i.e. that barring any other complicating factors, children should be in the care of their mothers). They neatly ignored all the middle eastern countries that blatantly favor fathers custody, or all the other western countries where mothers these days only have custody by default (i.e. custody only if the father doesn't object and/or fight them in court). As a result, you see Congressional leaders, the State Department, and the mainstream media cater to dads like MARK GOLDMAN (who even got a free plane ride to Brazil to pick up his son--courtesy of a U.S. television network.) Meanwhile, I find lots of stories about mothers subjected to international kidnapping where the story NEVER breaks outside the local media market, and where nobody from the State Department is charging in to help them in the slightest.

Please go here for additional information from the Hague Domestic Violence Project:

http://www.haguedv.org/

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110310a2.html

Thursday, March 10, 2011

Mothers make case against Hague treaty

By MASAMI ITO
Staff writer

Three Japanese mothers who took their children from the United States to Japan after failed international marriages urged the government Wednesday not to sign the Hague Treaty, which is aimed at preventing cross-border parental kidnapping.

The women, whose names have been withheld for privacy reasons, participated in a high-level government panel discussion on whether to sign the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

According to the participants, the women talked about their reasons for returning to Japan, and brought their children with them, claiming they made the move because of domestic violence.

After the meeting, one woman told reporters she began to find inexplicable bruises on her child after her ex-spouse's visitations. She said her child asked to be taken to Japan.

"If Japan were to sign the Hague Convention . . . (my child would) be forced to live with an abusive father and be exposed to violence again," the woman said. "And I will become a (declared) criminal."

The Hague Convention aims to promptly return children illegally taken out of their country of "habitual residence" by a parent. In U.S. divorce cases, for example, courts grant custody of children to a parent and spell out the other ex-spouse's visitation rights. But removal of an offspring from the country of residence thus also violates those legally mandated visitation rights.

The panel is holding a series of hearings involving experts and related parties and is expected to field opinions from proponents of the Hague Treaty on Thursday.

Japan has faced international pressure to sign the treaty but there are also strong voices against such action, many citing concerns that this would result in children being forced back to an abusive environment.

During the latter part of Wednesday's meeting, lawyers from the Japan Bar Association submitted a statement that points out legal aspects that need to be considered during the discussions, including the establishment of a domestic law that would prevent children from being forcefully returned to an abusive home.

Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Tetsuro Fukuyama, who heads the government panel, said the JBA statement is worth referring to if Japan decides to draft legislation.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Who are the child abusers? 70% are males, and 60% of these males are fathers (Japan)

Child abuse by mothers is always hyped in the media. That's why some story about a clueless young mother who duct tapes the baby to his high chair gets national coverage, while some father who murdered his three kids is hardly reported outside his local newspaper market. You see this bias in the Japanese media as well. The abusive mom who killed her 5-year-old daughter dominates the first half of this article. Meanwhile, if you stay with it long enough, you find out that 70 percent of these child abusers are MEN, and that MOST (60 percent) of these men are FATHERS.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110308i1.html

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

FYI
CHILD ABUSE
Domestic child abuse in spotlight
Centers' cases soar as public awareness of problem grows



By JUN HONGO
Staff writer
The Fukuoka District Court in January sentenced a 34-year-old mother to six years in prison for causing bodily injury resulting in her daughter's death, casting the spotlight anew on child abuse.

The 5-year-old was the target of incessant abuse, including confinement in a washing machine and being tied to a bookshelf in what the mother called "child discipline."

"The pain of having her life taken at the age of 5 due to outrageous abuse by the mother — who was in a position to protect her and raise her — is unimaginable," the district court judge said when handing down the ruling. The mother told the court she was "filled with regret" over her actions.

The following questions and answers give an overview of child abuse issues and how the government is trying to curb this disturbing trend.

How many cases of child abuse are reported in Japan each year?

Child abuse cases at public consultation offices shot to 44,210 in fiscal 2009, the government said last July. That was a record high and the 19th annual increase in a row since the government began gathering similar data in 1990, when only 1,101 cases of child abuse were reported.

Meanwhile a government research panel studying child abuse in fiscal 2008 revealed last July that there were 128 abuse-related deaths that year, including 61 children slain by suicidal elders. Most of the other 67 deaths were the result of physical violence.

Causes of death also included "neglect" or the failure by the guardian to provide for a child's needs, such as leaving an infant inside a car or leaving a newborn unattended.

The panel highlighted that of those killed by either abuse or neglect, nearly 60 percent were under 1 year old.

"It's been a trend that (children under 1) make up a large part of the victims" of child abuse, the panel said, adding that the government must introduce special measures.

In contrast, the U.S. National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System reported an estimated 1,740 child deaths in 2008. But since each country's definition of child abuse differs, it is difficult to compare U.S. numbers with Japan's.

Who are the major abusers?

National Police Agency statistics indicate 354 child abuse cases were processed in 2010 involving children younger than 18. Males accounted for 70 percent of the abusers, including 109 fathers. But 150, or nearly 40 percent of the total, were male nonblood relatives of the victim, including stepfathers and boyfriends of the mother.

What causes a parent to become abusive?

A government panel studying child-abuse deaths in 2008 said financial hardship, a complex combination of one's capability as a parent, mother-father relations, child-rearing difficulties and level of engagement with the community can all be potential seeds for a guardian to become abusive.

Their study found that about one out of every four abusive mothers claimed they had anxiety raising children, and over 65 percent said they had no or only very rare opportunities to engage with their community.

The report also said the percentage of abusive parents living on welfare was high compared with families that did not suffer child-abuse problems.

Why are reports of child abuse increasing?

Although some quarters say the government has failed to take measures to curb violence against children and thus abuses are increasing, others attribute the increased reporting partially to the rise in consultation offices and call centers, as well as growing public awareness of the types of problems going on behind closed doors.

"People have become more conscious about child abuse in Japan. They have their antennas up and are attentive," said a woman who works at the Center for Child Abuse Prevention in Setagaya Ward, Tokyo, who asked to remain anonymous.

The CCAP, which was designated as a social welfare service corporation in 1997, has received between 4,000 and 5,000 calls per year over the past decade. In fiscal 2009, it received 4,309 calls, the fewest since 1999.

"I believe there are more options today in terms of where someone can call to report child abuse," she said.

How does a child abuse prevention call center operate?

Assistance and advice over the phone are a major part of the job. For example, CCAP operates between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. on weekdays and from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Saturdays. Of the 4,309 calls the group received in fiscal 2009, 563 were from first-time callers, including parents, at 71 percent, who were worried about mistreating a child, and abused kids, at 9 percent, calling directly for help.

"The difficult part of our job is that a single phone call can become crucial," the worker, who asked to remain anonymous, said, explaining staff undergo special training in order to understand a caller's mindset. It is a key task to put the caller's emotions into perspective and substantiate what it was that prompted the call, she said.

CCAP will then tell the caller to contact a public consultation office if necessary, or operate as a go-between between the two so the caller can feel at ease.

Where can non-Japanese speakers turn to for advice about child-abuse issues?

Usually public consultation offices do not have full-time translators. Those who do not speak Japanese should visit a local office together with a Japanese speaker, the health ministry said.

Are public consultation offices effective in preventing child abuse?

To some extent, yes, but they have failed on some occasions, especially since it is sometimes not easy to differentiate an act of discipline from abuse or to take kids from parents.

One case that highlighted the powerlessness of consultation offices occurred last July in which two toddlers were abandoned by their mother and left to die in an Osaka apartment. Neighbors heard the 3-year-old girl and 1-year-old boy crying before the two starved to death.

Calls were made to the local public consultation office in the case, but visits to the apartment by an officer netted no results since no one answered the door. The worker could not locate or determine who the registered resident of the apartment was and hence could not obtain court permission to enter the apartment.

In perceived extraordinary circumstances, a consultation office can skip the court procedures and enter a dwelling, but it is seldom done.

What laws are there against child abuse?

Violence against children is illegal, particularly under the Child Abuse Prevention Law, which stipulates the types of abuse and makes it an obligation for a third party to report any signs of such acts.

The Cabinet recently approved an update to the law that allows the court to deprive one's right to exercise paternal authority for up to two years.

But some say that while it is easy to put the blame on a parent who beats a child, there is much more than meets the eye.

"In some cases, abusers turn out to be those who were abused during their own childhood," the worker at CCAP said, adding that "all mothers wish to become good mothers, without exception."

Treating the social malady will be much more complicated than tightening up laws against abusive parents, the worker added.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Judge Judith Ryan: another fathers rights judge run amuck (New South Wales, Australia)

Justice Judith Ryan is yet another one of these judicial incompetents with zero knowledge of child development, and zero concern for the interests or well being of children. Her only sympathy lays with the Rights of Der Vater.

Not suprisingly, Judge Ryan is also one of those buttinsky judges who feel they have every right to meddle and micromanage how other women raise their children. Who is she to decide when a 5-year-old girl should feel comfortable doing overnight visits with her father, a dad she has never even lived with, given that she was born AFTER her parents separated? Even the shrinks in this case think it's stupid for overnights to proceed this quickly.

This is a case where there is credible evidence of domestic violence against the mother too, given that she was previously awarded an apprehended violence order which named the child as a protected person. All ignored. Since under Australia's ridiculous "shared" parenting laws, the mom is being forced to "encourage" a relationship between her daughter and her ex whether she thinks it's in the best interest of the child or not. And even when there is a past history of abuse.

And notice how fathers rights goes hand in hand with denying even the barebones appearance of due process when it comes to mothers. Mom's request for a delay pending her request to get legal representation: DENIED. Mom's request for translation assistance in court: DENIED.

It's just the usual fathers rights set up. Corruption? Check. No interest in the well being of children? Check. Indifference to a past history of violence and future child abuse? Check. Contempt for even the minimal legal rights of mothers? Check.

An open appeal to the people of Japan: this state of affairs is what the fathers rights movement now wants to introduce into Japan--one of the few countries left that still respects the mother-child bond. You've been forwarned.

Hat tip to Annie.

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/judge-orders-that-fiveyearold-girl-must-sleep-over-at-fathers-home-20110110-19l87.html?from=smh_sb

Judge orders that five-year-old girl must sleep over at father's home
Geesche Jacobsen CRIME EDITOR
January 11, 2011

A JUDGE hearing a dispute over access to a five-year-old child has said the girl should no longer sleep in the same room as her mother or half-sister, so that she is better prepared to stay overnight with her father with whom she has never lived.

The Family Court ordered the girl have overnight visits to her father from January even though a family consultant said in October that she would not be confident ''for some considerable time'' to stay overnight. Another psychologist had recommended the child be given ''no less than two years'' to adjust to sleepovers at her father's home.

The mother, a Japanese migrant who cannot be named for legal reasons, says she has concerns for her daughter's wellbeing if she were to stay with her former husband overnight.

The couple were married for less than a year before they separated, and the girl was born after the separation.

Her mother, Ms K, said she was abused and was later awarded an apprehended violence order, which also named the child as a protected person. This has since expired. The law requires Ms K to encourage her daughter to visit the father despite her concerns.

When the orders were made in court, Ms K was not legally represented and had asked for the case to be adjourned pending her appeal for legal aid. She also said she had trouble following the proceedings because the court did not wait for her translator to translate what was said. A request for a friend to help her was denied at least once.

An application for a stay was rejected and she has been told it could take about 11 months for an appeal to be heard.

The girl has slept away from her mother's home only if either her mother or older half sister was with her, and at home sleeps in the same room as either of them.

Last month Justice Judith Ryan said steps ''should be taken within the mother's home … forthwith'' to progress the girl's ''emotional readiness for overnight time with the father''.

''The child is old enough to sleep independently from her mother and sister.''

But, in a complaint to the Chief Justice, Diana Bryant, Ms K accused the judge of bias and said: ''The living arrangements in my home are none of Justice Ryan's business; her instructions are an invasion of my privacy.''

Ms K says the father has failed to abide by earlier visiting arrangements. He disputes this and claims she has breached the arrangement and is failing to encourage their daughter to visit him. The court is yet to hear this dispute but has made interim orders for access.

When refusing the stay, Justice Ryan said she had ''reservations about the mother's bona fides and whether her appeal is merely a delay tactic''.

''There is hardship to [the father] and not insubstantial risk of harm to him and the child developing a meaningful relationship if the commencement of overnight time is further delayed.''
The child has recently refused to visit the father even during the day.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

International Law Permits Abusive Fathers Custody of Children

A must read for any mom contemplating a move out of the U.S. And any mothers currently living elsewhere and hoping to return to the U.S. The more you learn abou the Hague Convention, the less there is to like.

http://www.newswise.com/articles/international-law-permits-abusive-fathers-custody-of-children

International Law Permits Abusive Fathers Custody of Children
Released: 12/7/2010 9:00 AM EST
Source: University of Washington

Newswise — A new survey of court cases against battered women living abroad shows that when the women left their abusive partners and returned with their children to the United States, half of the time, U.S. courts sent the children back, usually to their fathers.

The survey, co-authored by a University of Washington researcher, also shows that almost a third of these estranged husbands filed criminal kidnapping charges against their wives.

Released in time for Human Rights Day, Dec. 10, the survey is intended to help to establish domestic violence as a factor in whether courts send children back to their fathers. And the authors of the report hope their website serves as a resource for women and lawyers faced with Hague petitions.

The children’s return is in accordance with an international treaty, the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which affects thousands of children each year.

The Hague Convention does not explicitly factor in domestic violence in deciding whether to send children back to the country where they lived. But since the treaty was created 30 years ago, social science research has demonstrated that a child’s exposure to domestic violence is just as harmful as direct abuse. Children who witness domestic violence are at higher risk for emotional problems, and later in life, they have a greater risk for violence in adult interpersonal relationships.

Now social scientists say that it’s time for the law to catch up with science, especially as these cases are likely to dramatically increase as more binational families form and countries such as India and Japan consider adopting the treaty in the next few years.

“The law is not paying attention to the effects domestic violence have on women and their children,” said Taryn Lindhorst, co-author of the report and a UW associate professor of social work. “This is like a tip of an iceberg: we’ve only seen some of the cases.” Lindhorst is an expert in the effects of domestic abuse on women.

The report is the first effort in the United States to interview mothers and attorneys about their experiences with the Hague Convention, in hopes of better preparing mothers and their lawyers for court proceedings in these cases.

The 404-page report, funded and published by the U.S. National Institute of Justice, includes analysis and excerpts of interviews with 22 mothers and 23 lawyers who represented mothers and fathers in Hague lawsuits and an analysis of court decisions on previous Hague cases involving domestic violence.

Most of the mothers had been living with their husbands in Europe, the Middle East or Latin America. They had moved abroad when their marriages were more stable or they had been tricked into moving.

In the report, the co-authors describe frequent, life-threatening domestic abuse endured by the women: beatings, threats with guns, ice picks and other weapons and – in a few cases – rape. Since most of the women were not citizens of the country where they were living, they were usually unable to obtain resources available to domestic violence victims in that country.

Moving back to the United States became the best option.

None of the women in the study knew about the Hague Convention before returning to the United States, Lindhorst said. Many of them learned about it when federal agents arrived at their homes to take their children into custody. Some mothers were required to be in court within a matter of hours. Scrambling for a lawyer, most could not find a lawyer experienced with the Hague Convention.

The court decisions were grim for the women. In almost half, 12 of 22, the court sent the children back to the country they had fled from with their mothers. In seven of those cases, the fathers gained custody. Seven women – a third of the sample – also faced criminal kidnapping charges in foreign courts.

Ironically, when the Hague Convention Treaty was created in 1980, it was intended to protect women and children. Lawmakers wanted to expedite the return of children taken by a parent – usually the father – who was unsatisfied by a child custody decision.

But, as it turns out, the law has been used primarily by fathers. Nearly 70 percent of Hague petitions are filed by fathers, said Jeffrey Edleson, co-author and professor of social work at the University of Minnesota.

In many cases, filing a Hague petition is an attempt by the abusive father to use the court to extend control over mother and child,” said Edleson, an expert on children’s exposure to domestic violence in the home.

In the Hague Convention cases examined in the report, courts tended not to consider domestic violence toward the mother when assessing whether the children should be returned to their father. In cases where the children are returned and end up in the fathers’ care, it’s because the judges see the mother as a kidnapper, Edleson said.

Once returned to the father, the children may be exposed to more violence. Typically, the mothers move back too to be closer to their children and some were abused again. Sometimes the fathers would physically abuse their children.

The report is part of the HagueDV Project on international child abduction and domestic violence, led by Lindhorst and Edleson. On Human Rights Day, Dec. 10, the group will hold a free event in Minneapolis of actors reading the battered mothers’ stories interspersed with commentary by law and social science experts. The event will also be available by webcast. For more information and to register, go to: http://www.haguedv.org/

Friday, November 5, 2010

Mums reunited with stolen children--but they have no chance in getting custody (United Kingdom)

Most of the time, the media and international diplomats focus on cases involving fathers like MARK GOLDMAN or CHRISTOPHER SAVOIE, who claim their children were "kidnapped" by their mothers. Both managed to get major media financial and governmental support. Goldman even got a U.S TV network to fly him to Brazil to "save" his son. Both have managed to get the U.S. State Department and US Congressman to actively help them.

Contrast that with these UK mothers, where the governmental authorities take a very ho-hum attitude about their plight. We hear nothing but endless complaints about countries like Japan for favoring moms. We hear nothing at all about al the countries like Libya or others where fathers are catered to. Where's the State Department outrage about that?

http://bigpondnews.com/articles/World/2010/11/05/UK_mums_reunited_with_stolen_children_535486.html

UK mums reunited with 'stolen children'
Friday, November 05, 2010 » 04:08pm

Sky News has been given unprecedented access to travel to Libya with a group of mothers being reunited with their children after their fathers took them abroad.

In most cases the children were abducted. But in all cases the mothers have virtually no chance of getting them back.

The trip was organised by the UK charity Children and Families Across Borders.

The idea was for the mothers to get two weeks' organised access to their children at a holiday camp in the Libyan capitol Tripoli.

The project has the backing of Libya's leader Colonel Gaddafi.

We set off for Tripoli with a group of mothers and grandparents from across the UK and Europe.

Anita Lewis from Norwich was married to a Libyan who snatched her five children 10 years ago.

She told us how her life changed forever when her ex-husband came to pick up their children one day and never brought them back.

'He hired a couple - a husband and wife - with a passport with 10 children on it which was used to smuggle my children out as their children,' she said.

'It was all very well organised. When the news comes that they are in Libya I guess you're supposed to be relieved that at least they are alive.

'But for me it was my worst fear realised - knowing I wouldn't be able to get them back.'

Anita travelled to Libya with her two youngest children from another relationship.

On the steps of the holiday village, she was reunited with her two oldest boys Hamza, 15, and Ali, 17.

Waiting inside were her daughters Rumaysa, 21, Safiya, 19, and Aisha, 12.

They were forbidden by their father from being greeted by their mother in front of our cameras.
Their father, Azzedin Elgirnazi, stood in reception watching everything.

He had also checked into the holiday village to keep watch over his ex-wife for her entire two-week stay.

Azzedin is still wanted by Interpol for five counts of child abduction.

In the past year, there has been a 39% increase in the number of British children abducted and taken to countries not signed up to the Hague Convention - an international protocol to help parents get their children back.

Few countries outside Europe observe the convention.

Marek Ganther from Children and Families Across Borders said: 'In Libya and most of the Arabic world it's virtually impossible to get your child back.

'There just aren't the legal mechanisms as there are with countries that are signatories to the Hague Convention on the international aspects of child abduction which does provide a speedy mechanism for the return and the resolution of these problems.

'I think we need the world to recognise that these days there are many more trans-cultural marriages and relationships and there is much more movement across borders and so these problems are only likely to increase.

'I think that some of the fathers feel that they can do whatever they want here.'

Thursday, September 30, 2010

House condemns Japan on custody rights; since when do the FRs control the state department?

Why is Japan being singled out for attention? Kids are held in countries all over the world by one parent or another, while the other parent sits in the U.S. And most of the time, the U.S. government can't be bothered. Well, they come out and say it. Japan is "tilted towards fathers." No wasted space here on American moms who can't get their kids out of the middle east. Nope. It's pretty clear here what leverage the FR movement has when they can command the attention of the top U.S. diplomat of East Asia and the U.S. Secretary of State in this ridiculous attempt to alienate a major U.S. ally--all because their culture still values mothers as primary caretakers. Of all the horrible things going on in the world, these two top American officials are supposed to drop everything to address 121 children living with their Japanese mothers? This is not only ridiculous from a mother's rights standpoint, but a ridiculous waste of government time.

We've also reported on dad CHRISTOPHER SAVOIE before, whose past is far more checkered than is let on here. See our earlier posts on this case by searching under Japan.

http://www.thestate.com/2010/09/29/1489144/house-condemns-japan-on-custody.html

Wednesday, Sep. 29, 2010
House condemns Japan on custody rights
By FOSTER KLUG - Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON — The House turned up the pressure Wednesday on close ally Japan, strongly urging Tokyo to return immediately half-Japanese children that lawmakers say have been kidnapped from their American parents.

The House voted overwhelmingly for a nonbinding resolution that "condemns the abduction and retention" of children held in Japan "in violation of their human rights and United States and international law."

The resolution, which passed 416-1, also calls for Japan to allow Americans to visit their children and for the Japanese government to join a 1980 international convention on child abduction that would allow for the quick return of the children to America.

Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., told reporters that the resolution sends a strong signal to Japan that Congress "is watching and expecting action."

Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., said, "Americans are fed up with our friend and ally Japan and their pattern of noncooperation."

The Japanese Embassy said in a statement that Japan is sympathetic to the plight of children caught in custody battles between Japanese and American citizens and "is continuing to make sincere efforts to deal with this issue from the standpoint that the welfare of the child should be of the utmost importance."

The United States often calls Japan its lynchpin ally in Asia, and tens of thousands of U.S. troops are stationed in Japan. But Japan's stance on custody rights has been a source of friction. U.S. lawmakers say at least 121 American children currently are being held in Japan.

Japanese law allows only one parent to have custody in cases of divorce, usually the mother. Activists say the court system in Japan is tilted against fathers and foreigners.

Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, the top U.S. diplomat for East Asia, told lawmakers at a hearing Wednesday that the issue is a priority, with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton raising it in meetings with her Japanese counterpart.

Campbell said he also would raise the matter when he travels to Tokyo next week and that Japan should act urgently.

Christopher Savoie, a father who was arrested last year after going to Japan in a failed attempt to reclaim his two children who were taken from Franklin, Tenn., by his Japanese ex-wife, joined lawmakers and other fathers at a news conference before the House vote.

Read more: http://www.thestate.com/2010/09/29/1489144/house-condemns-japan-on-custody.html#ixzz1125tMw1s

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Dad gets 11 years for son's death in garbage can (Tokyo, Japan)

Dad YOSHIHIRO KANNO has been sentenced to 11 years in prison for suffocating his 2-year-old son in a garbage can. This child basically endured torture--being forcefed deodorizer and cigarette butts, placed in ovens and washing machines. And he has the nerve to say he did so on his wife's order. Really? I don't believe that for a minute. And you were incapable of saying "iie" (no)?

http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/20100220TDY02302.htm

Dad gets 11 yrs for son's death in garbage can
The Yomiuri Shimbun

The Tokyo District Court on Thursday sentenced a man to 11 years in prison for suffocating his 2-year-old son by confining him in a garbage can.

Prosecutors had called for Yoshihiro Kanno, 35, to receive 12 years in prison. They argued during the lay judge trial that 52 injuries were found on the body of his son, Yui, apparently the result of abuse. In addition to trying to make Yui eat deodorizer and cigarette butts, Yoshihiro also put him in an oven and a washing machine and briefly turned them on, they said.

Prosecutors told the court Yoshihiro put Yui into a garbage can at about 4 a.m. on Dec. 23, 2008, covered the bin with a plastic bag and tied an elastic cord around it. Yoshihiro left Yui inside the can until he found the boy dead that evening, prosecutors said.

The defense insisted Yoshihiro abused the boy only because he was asked to by his wife, Rika, 35, who also is accused of suffocating the boy. However, the court's ruling said Yoshihiro admitted he abused the boy because he was angry. No matter what the reason, Yoshihiro played an important role in the boy's murder, the ruling said.

Wife's testimony was sought

All six lay judges in the trial attended a press conference after the court was adjourned.

Neither prosecutors nor the defense called Rika as a witness--instead the deposition she gave during the investigation of the case was read out in court. Lay judge Masahiko Kanda, 45, said he wanted to directly hear from Rika, because her deposition differed from Yoshihiro's testimony on some points.

There reportedly was a request during deliberations to hear from Rika.

Lay judge Hiroshi Seiki, a 60-year-old photographer, said: "I suppose [Yoshihiro] started the abuse half in sport. I thought it was frightening that an adult bullied someone like a child."

(Feb. 20, 2010)

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

High court rejects shared parenting plan (Sydney, Australia)

Thank goodness we're seeing signs that Australian authorities are starting to question the "shared parenting" ideology that's become such gospel as of late. It's as if one hasn't even been allowed to challenge this nonsense without being labeled a heretic and threatened with the stake accordingly.

Let's face facts. "Shared custody" just doesn't work for many families. Unless families choose "shared parenting" willingly, and it works for everyone involved, it doesn't work. Using "shared custody" to lock mothers into rural areas with no job opportunities and permanent poverty does not benefit children. No mother should EVER be coerced into "shared parenting." And many who say they "chose" it end up admitting they were railroaded into it, and that the children DID NOT benefit by being passed around like so many hot potatoes.

I hope Japan is following these events, as "shared custody" is now being aggressively promoted in that country.

http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/high-court-rejects-shared-parenting-plan-20100303-pir2.html

High Court rejects shared parenting plan
March 3, 2010 - 6:29PM

AAP

A court order requiring a Sydney mother and Mount Isa father to share parenting of their seven-year-old might have been in the child's best interests, but it just wasn't feasible, the High Court has ruled.

High Court judges said the Federal Court magistrate who made the original order should have considered whether it was actually practicable for the daughter to spend equal time or even substantial time with each parent.

The High Court initially handed down its decision in December but only released its reasons on Wednesday.

The court heard the couple lived together in Sydney from 1993 until 2007, and their daughter had been born in August 2002.

In January 2007 the family moved to Mount Isa to allow the husband to gain work experience.

The parents separated in August 2007, with the mother and daughter returning to Sydney. But three months later they returned to Mount Isa in accordance with interim orders sought by the father and made by the Federal Magistrates Court.

Final orders, made in April 2008, gave the parents equal shared responsibility for their daughter and directed that she spend equal time with each parent on the basis that both would live in Mount Isa.

The Full Court of the Family Court dismissed the mother's appeal, but the High Court took a different view.

Judges noted that the legislation stipulated that a child's best interests were to be the paramount consideration in parenting orders, with a presumption that this could be best achieved by parents sharing responsibility.

However, that presumption could be rebutted, with the legislation also requiring consideration of the parents' circumstances, particularly the mother.

In this case, the mother was living in a caravan park and relying on welfare payments and income from casual work, with her daughter staying with her every second week.

The mother was also suffering depression from her poor living conditions, lack of employment opportunities and isolation from her family in Sydney.

The High Court judges said the federal magistrate addressed only the question of whether it was in the child's best interests for her to spend equal time with each parent.

He made no assessment of whether spending equal time with each parent was actually feasible, they said.

"Had consideration been given to the question, only one conclusion could have been reached, one which did not permit the making of the order," they said.

The case was sent back to the Federal Magistrates Court to be reheard.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Mom felt trapped in Tennesee--no income, no family or friends (Franklin, Tennessee)

One of the few articles to be found in the media that have even bothered to present the mother's point of view in the attempted kidnapping by dad CHRISTOPHER SAVOIE. The vast majority have focused on Dad, wife #2 (the apparent mistress married one month after the divorce who is now eager to strip her stepkids of their mom), or dad's assorted friends and muchachos. It truly appears that Dad set her up by divorcing her in Tennessee, where she would very likely lose custody as a foreign woman with no income or support system. He also sounds like a very verbally abusive person--at minimum.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/33130396/ns/today-parenting_and_family/

Friend: Mom who fled to Japan felt trapped
Noriko Savoie took kids with her; dad arrested for trying to retrieve them


Christopher Savoie’s ex-wife, Noriko, took their two children to Japan. She is one of a number of Japanese mothers who have brought their children back to Japan and refused to let their ex-husbands visit them.

updated 6:55 p.m. CT, Thurs., Oct . 1, 2009

FRANKLIN, Tennessee - A friend says Noriko Savoie felt trapped — she was a Japanese citizen new to the U.S. whose American husband had just served her divorce papers.

Her disintegrating marriage likely would have ended with little notice had she not fled to Japan, where her ex-husband was arrested this week trying to get the children she took with her into the diplomatic protection of a U.S. consulate.

Noriko Savoie did not have court permission to bring the children to the country where they had spent most of their lives, and Christopher Savoie says he didn't do anything wrong when he tried to get them back.

Court records and conversations with a friend, Miiko Crafton, make it clear that Noriko Savoie was hurt and angry from the divorce and chafing at the cultural differences.

She had no income when she moved to the U.S. in June 2008, divorce court filings show, and appears to have been totally dependent on Christopher Savoie, who was still legally her husband but was involved with another woman.

Crafton, a native of Japan who befriended Noriko Savoie during her short time in Tennessee, said her friend tried to get a divorce while the couple still lived in Japan, but her husband had refused and later persuaded her to move to the U.S. with the children.

"Everything was provided so she could begin a new lifestyle, but right after that he gave her divorce papers," Crafton said. "So basically she was trapped."

'She always looked sad'

Although financially stable — she was awarded close to $800,000 in cash as well as other support in the divorce — Noriko Savoie was not free to return to Japan. She was given primary custody of the children, but her ex-husband was also awarded time with them.

She felt mistreated by the courts and emotionally abused by her ex-husband, Crafton said.

In court, she accused Christopher Savoie of threatening to have her father jailed over a disagreement stemming from the sale of a car.

In a hostile e-mail from Christopher Savoie that was entered into the court record, he called her an "idiot" and accused her of "poisoning the children against me." He complained about the large cash payout she got and monthly support payments.

But Crafton said Noriko Savoie was trying to settle into life in Tennessee. For example, she tried to enroll in college.

"She was very positive, but she always looked sad," Crafton said. "It was a really, really sad situation."

Meanwhile, Christopher Savoie complained that she refused to let him see the children during appointed times, screened his calls with them and insulted him and argued with him in front of them.

And, according to court records, he had an overriding fear that she would take the children to Japan, where he thought he would have little legal recourse and might never be able to see them again.

In Japan, if a couple gets divorced, one parent, almost always the mother, often gets sole custody. Divorced fathers typically have little access.

'Children have right to see both parents'

Christopher Savoie remarried in the month following the divorce, and Noriko Savoie wrote him an e-mail soon after, asking him to keep his new wife and her children away and stop criticizing their marriage.

"These things are effecting my life a lot," she wrote. "I need to stay healthy in order to stay here."

That e-mail became a key piece of evidence when Christopher Savoie unsuccessfully tried to convince the courts not to allow her to take the children to Japan on vacation.

She returned on July 30 as planned, but went back with the children just two weeks later.

Christopher Savoie was arrested by Japanese police on Monday as he tried to enter a U.S. Consulate in the southern city of Fukuoka with the 6- and 8-year-old children after snatching them away from their mother as they walked to school.

Local police said they received permission from the court to keep Savoie in custody for 10 days.

He told CNN in an interview that he wants his children to know he loves them.

"I didn't do anything wrong," he said. "Children have the right to see both parents. It's very important for my children to know both parents."

Christopher Savoie had been granted full custody of the children by an American court after Noriko Savoie abducted them, and the courts here issued a warrant for her arrest on charges of custodial interference.

Crafton said she felt sorry for Christopher Savoie but did not approve of his actions.

"If he's really thinking of the kids, he shouldn't be doing some dramatic movie-type thing like snatching the kids," Crafton said. "He could have made other arrangements. He speaks Japanese very well and has Japanese citizenship."

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Is Tennessee a "redneck" place for moms and children? An Inquiry

In some of the coverage on dad CHRISTOPHER SAVOIE, it has been suggested that Tennesee is a good ol' boy place that doesn't treat mothers and children in an especially admirable fashion. For purposes of public edification, I humbly offer to Dastardly's loyal reader the following Dastardly headlines from Tennesee. As you can see, these assertions (no doubt planted by feminazis and the foreign element) are utterly baseless and totally un-American!

(Check it out. And by the way, Tennessee barbeque sucks too.)

Dad abducts pregnant 12-year-old daughter and her sister (Nashville, Tennessee)
September 30, 2009
http://www.newschannel5.com/Global/story.asp?S=11229779

Dad arrested in murder of pregnant girlfriend (Memphis, Tennessee)
September 27, 2009
http://www.wsmv.com/news/21133465/detail.html

Stepdad accused of raping 9-year-old girl out on bail (Munford, Tennessee)
March 2007
http://www.myeyewitnessnews.com/news/local/story/Accused-Tipton-County-Child-Rapist-Out-of-Jail/N1saKQB1yEuKQsgET9qU2A.cspx

Dad convicted of raping daughter and torture with shock collar (Azewell, Tennessee)
September 24, 2008
http://www.myeyewitnessnews.com/news/state/story/Father-Convicted-of-Raping-Daughter-and-Torture/Rj5-9mo2rUyGyiZSQ_4qAQ.cspx

Dad to be sentenced in baby's murder; turns out he pleaded guilty to killing another newborn son in 2002 (Chattanooga, Tennesee)
September 4, 2009
http://www.wrcbtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=11079285

Dad arrested after he admits he sexually abused 23-month-old daughter (Bartlett, Tennessee)
September 4, 2009
http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/dpp/news/local/090409_Bartlett_Dad_Jailed_for_Fondling_Baby

Dad charged with 1st-degree murder of infant daughter who was only 96 days old; baby died of blunt-force trauma to the head (Memphis, Tennessee)
August 20, 2009
http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2009/aug/20/honoring-jalissa/

Dad installs cameras to spy in daughter's bathroom (Murray County, Tennessee)
August 10, 2009
http://www.newschannel9.com/news/daughter-983580-installing-confirms.html

Dad who shot and killed daughter, foster father was custodial (Dyersburg, Tennessee)
August 3, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/08/03/us/AP-US-Northwest-Tennessee-Shootings.html

Dad leaves 3-year-old son alone in truck while he goes to courthouse (Nashville, Tennessee)
July 23, 2009
http://www.wsmv.com/news/20159239/detail.html

Dad's retrial begins in death of 20-day-old son (Dayton, Tennessee)
July 21, 2009
http://www.solid-state.com/display_news/133193495/5/pennwellsolidstatetech/Poe

UPDATE: Killer dad had tried to get child custody before (Lincoln County, Tennessee)
July 21, 2009
http://www.al.com/crime/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/news/124816772865060.xml&coll=1

Dad/stepdad slaughters family (Fayetteville, Tennessee)
July 19, 2009
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090719/ap_on_re_us/us_southern_tennessee_slayings

Oh, and one of my personal faves. Try to live this down, Tennessee:
Daddy facing firearms charges after fight with son over lunch meat (Loudon, Tennessee)
July 17, 2009
Daddy BARRY THOMAS MYERS hauled out his 12-gauge shot gun over...bologna? The son he was fighting with (over "lunch meat") had fled the home by the time Daddy got out on the front porch and fired off that bad boy, so at least nobody got hurt. But then Daddy's on parole for a meth lab conviction, so I suppose we can't set our expectations too high, can we?
http://www.volunteertv.com/home/headlines/51037692.html

Dad on trial for felony murder in death of 7-week-old daughter (Knoxville, Tennessee)
July 14, 2009
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/jul/14/father-trial-his-babys-death/

The "American" dad who tried to kidnap his kids from Japan? He's not American! (Kukuoka, Japan)

Since press coverage on dad CHRISTOPHER SAVOIE has been domininated by a pro-America, pro-father slant, little official word has come out regarding the real story regarding his citizenship and background as a husband and father. But now a lot of the back story is starting to come together. It turns out that Dad isn't even an American citizen anymore! Exerpt from CNN (major points highlighted in bold):

http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/09/30/japan.savoie.children/

TOKYO, Japan (CNN) -- The case of a Tennessee man jailed in Japan for trying to snatch back his children from his estranged wife is not as clear-cut as it's been made out to be, authorities here said Wednesday.

A Tennessee court awarded Christopher Savoie custody of his son, Isaac, and daughter, Rebecca.
The father, Christopher Savoie, apparently became a naturalized Japanese citizen four years ago, listing a permanent address in Tokyo, they said.

And while he and Noriko Savoie, a Japanese native, divorced in Tennessee, the two never annulled their marriage in Japan, Japanese officials said.

Also, the two children at the center of the case hold Japanese passports, they said.

"His chances of getting his children back home to the States, I think, are pretty slim right now," Jeremy Morley, Savoie's lawyer in the United States, told CNN's "AC 360" on Tuesday night.

Wonder what our pro-America/pro-daddy crowd will think of THAT! He gave up his American citizenship! That's downright, uh, un-American!

Here's another piece from CNN that explains the Japanese perspective on this issue:

YANAGAWA, Japan (CNN) -- Wearing a Nashville School of Law T-shirt, Christopher Savoie walked into a second-floor police interrogation room. In one corner, a stopwatch was running to hold him to the 15 minutes allotted for the interview.

A Tennessee court awarded Christopher Savoie custody of his son, Isaac, and daughter, Rebecca.

"I'm so scared," he said.

Savoie chose his words carefully, lest police Officer Toshihiro Tanaka cut short the rare interview Savoie was granted with CNN on Thursday. There were so many rules: No recording devices. No tough questions. Speak only in Japanese.

"I want Americans to know what's happening to me," Savoie continued in Japanese. "I didn't do anything wrong. Children have the right to see both parents. It's very important for my children to know both parents."

But Japanese authorities disagree.

They have charged Savoie, 38, a Tennessee native and naturalized Japanese citizen, with kidnapping his two children -- 8-year-old Isaac and 6-year-old Rebecca -- as his estranged wife, Noriko, was walking them to school Monday in Yanagawa, a rural town in southern Japan.

He headed for the nearest U.S. consulate, in the city of Fukuoka, to try to obtain passports for the children, screaming at the guards to let him in the compound. He was steps away from the front gate but still standing on Japanese soil.

Japanese police, alerted by his estranged wife, arrested him.

The Savoies were divorced in Tennessee in January after 14 years of marriage. The marriage has not been annulled in Japan, and the children hold Japanese passports.

Christopher Savoie had visitation rights with his children, but after he returned from a short summer trip, his estranged wife fled to Japan with the children, according to court documents. A United States court then granted sole custody to Savoie.

Japanese law, however, recognizes Noriko Savoie as the primary custodian, regardless of the U.S. court order.

A 1980 Hague Convention standardized laws on international child abduction. But Japan is not a party to that agreement. Savoie was out of luck.

If a child in Japan is taken against the wishes of the recognized Japanese parent, the person who took the child is considered an abductor.

"Japanese people think she's the victim here," Savoie said. "In the States, my ex-wife is the one who's in the wrong."

U.S. State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley recognized this case as a difficult one. Even though the United States has strong ties with Japan, on this particular issue, the two nations' points of view could not differ more, he said.

In Yanagawa, those who have heard about the abduction case tend to side with the woman.

"They belong with their real mother," said one woman, herself a mother of two children.

Savoie's attorney, Tadashi Yoshino, knows the cultural divide will be hard to overcome.

"He technically may have committed a crime according to Japanese law but he shouldn't be indicted," Yoshino said. "He did it for the love of his children."

Savoie, a law student who already has a Ph.D. and a M.D., will spend 10 days in jail while Japanese prosecutors sort out the details of the case.

In the interrogation room, Savoie appeared exhausted. Tears welled in his eyes. He glanced over at the police officer, then paused to regain composure.

"I love you, Isaac, Rebecca," he said. "Your daddy loves you forever. I'll be patient and strong until the day comes that I can see you both again. I am very sorry that I can't be with you."

He was grateful be able to get the words out. Moments earlier, the interview had almost ended after Savoie blurted out in English: "I love you," a message intended for his current wife, Amy, in Nashville.

Then, as is Japanese custom, he bowed. And from the other side of the glass barrier, he gave a thumbs up, mouthing the words, "Thank you."

Here's another typical article, in this case from CBS news.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/29/crimesider/entry5351308.shtml#addcomm

I won't even bother to reproduce it here. Check it out yourself if you're interested.

Suffice it to say we have all the melodramatic effects we've come to expect: 1) the crying second wife who swears Dad is a "very good man" (but a man who nevertheless is perfectly fine with "shoving" traumatized kids into a car and stripping of them of their mother, only to be replaced with the next wife); 2) only the position of dad's friends and families is even considered.

But look at what some of the "unofficial" word is from the street level:

"There is so much more to this story than what the American news is letting you see. He should have never had the kids to begin with. I am sure she felt the only way to protect the kids was to move to Japan because the redneck government in TN wouldn't allow her custody. In such a conservative place, when else has the mother not been awarded custody - only when the mother is foreign. "

"And just to add, he is not a hero and no one should have looked at him that way. You cannot run off to another country to commit a crime. Two wrongs don't make a right. Imagine for a moment that an Arab woman came to the US to take her kids away from an American man. Would she be labeled a hero here?"

"I have done work in TN and I can unabashedly say they are bigotted rednecks who are more concerned with church attendence rather than behavior. I am not prejudice, I am a victim of it....You said Noriko should have her case heard in US courts for due process however in the TN court system there is no due process for Japanese women who have been discriminated against for as long as people have lived in TN. There is a huge cultural difference between Japan and America. We cannot judge them for what has worked for them for longer than this country has existed. I am sure we wouldn't want their values imposed on us which is exactly the reason why we can't impose our values on them. "

"You should know that the children are Japanese citizens. It could be argued that keeping them here would be kidnapping. I have been to TN and most of them that I met are rednecks. The ones that weren't rednecks weren't originally from TN."

"What makes this man a "hero"?!! Just because he is a man or is it because he is an American??! If he is a good father, why didn't he think about the damage that will happen to the kids when he snatches them from their mother's hand and "force" them in his car?? If he is a reasonable man how come he didn't expect to be stopped by authorities before he reaches the consulate?!! And why didn't he seek other options rather than kidnapping the kids?! And on the other hand, do a few tears make the current wife - who just got into this family's life - a better mom than their real mother??!The media is evil sometimes!!"

"I think it cannot be stressed enough the psychological trauma that man delivered to his children. His son didn't even seem to want to leave and we have no idea if his daughter wanted to leave as they were snatched and shoved into a car. It was a violent abduction. It is the reason he was arrested."

"You left out that we don't follow the court orders of Japan and most other countries with regards to family law matters and most other court orders. The Hague Convention on CHILD ABDUCTION has nothing to do with custody disputes between divorced people. I would also argue it takes extreme arrogance and hypocrisy to judge the Japanese legal system. What made you right? Your opinion? It is a totally different culture that most people will never understand. For their people, it works. "

"Guys, it's game over. It's been reported that he was arrested in front of the US consulate because the consulate didn't let him in, since he denounced his US citizenship. (Japan doesn't allow its citizen to hold more than one citizenship.) All of what he did in the US while hiding his Japanese citizenship is now in question."

"What did he expect going to the American embassy as he is now a Japanese citizen?It is obvious that we have here a Mr Savoie, skilled in cheating and manipulating administrations, people and most of all his first wife and kids.He does not deserve to hold the latter."

"Chistopher Savoie is a shady man. He cheated on his wife and was remarried to the mistress a month later. He isn't even American anymore. He renounced his citizenship and is Japanese law. He is subject to all Japanese laws now. He is slimey"

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Japanese view: American dad kidnapping kids "not news"

I was interested to track down Japanese views on American dad CHRISTOPHER SAVOIE and his attempt to abduct his children from their mother and take them back to the U.S. And I just couldn't find anything. I kept wondering why my searches of various Japanese newspapers--even in Fukuoka--kept coming up with zero.

Then I found this piece on CNN. Seems the Japanese don't see this as "news," so they're not reporting it. Needless to say, the apparently Japanese reporter who interviewed various Americans found that they all declared--in a rather jingoistic humph--that Japan's ways of doing things were "archaic and rigid" because they're different from the way things are now done in U.S. The reporter also asserts that Japan treats DV and child abuse as strictly private affairs, and ignores them somehow because they believe in sole custody. Where the evidence for that is, I don't know. And you don't think that Americans try to sweep DV and child abuse under the rug too, especially in family court? Of course they do.

Frankly, I'm not seeing any of it. According to one of the very few articles on the attempted abduction to come out of Japan (Japan Times--posted here earlier today), one of the reasons that Japan doesn't endorse the Hague Convention is because too many Japanese women are being abused by foreigner husbands, so there's a need to protect them and their children post-divorce through sole custody. So the Japanese seem to be quite aware of domestic violence, at least no less so than the Americans, who are always trying to push battered women into joint custody with a violent ex-husband.

The comments to this CNN piece are interesting too. Of course, you have the usual self-righteous fathers rights types and disgrunted ex-husbands. But you also see a lot of Japanese anger over American attempts to meddle in their family policies. I've reproduced some of these mostly Japanese responses below the CNN piece. Oh, and check out the little digs regarding the U.S. criminal justice system, high violent crime rates, high divorce rates, and lack of universal health care. Juicy stuff!

An interesting question comes to mind here. If the FRs insist that selfish American women get divorces in high numbers because they get everything (in reality, they mostly get poverty and joint custody), then WHY is the divorce rate much lower in Japan? With the promise of sole custody, you'd figure every married Japanese woman would be clamoring for a divorce--if the FR assumption were correct. Quite the opposite. So it doesn't appear that divorce rates necessarily have much to do with cultural assumptions about custody.

http://inthefield.blogs.cnn.com/2009/09/30/family-mans-plight-not-news-in-japan/

Family man’s plight not news in Japan
Posted: 806 GMT

Christopher Savoie’s case is playing out dramatically over the airwaves and in the blogosphere — an American man with sole legal custody of his young children, jailed in Japan for trying to bring his abducted children back to the U.S.

But if you’re Japanese, you’ve never heard of Savoie, because the story hasn’t been on a newscast or in the newspapers.

Based in Tokyo, among our first calls was to the local press in Fukuoka. The newspaper told us “This isn’t news.” When we asked if they would cover it because of the growing international interest, the paper flatly said, “No.”

That response is a window into the Japanese mindset of the privacy of the home, and helps explain the cultural and legal clash in which Savoie is trapped.

Invading into the domicile is considered taboo, where issues like domestic violence and child abuse still culturally remain private matters.

Japanese family law follows suit, hesitant to order families to recognize joint custody. It prefers to obey the cultural norm of the woman having primary custody, which often means the father never has any contact with the children. That would be unthinkable in a U.S. court, which sees joint custody as a matter of course in divorce.

The Americans I’ve interviewed in this story say they’re flabbergasted by Japan’s archaic and rigid laws. But in this culture, there’s no discussion about it. They don’t even consider it news.

Posted by: Kyung Lah

And a few of the reader responses:

How is it archaic just because it disagrees with American laws and values?
Why is it always that American values are considered fashionable, while East Asian values are considered a thing of the past? Americans need to wake up and start to realize that as they associate themselves more in this ever increasingly globalized world, that them and their values are not superior.

American opinion regarding children and divorce is very onesided. Yesterday the news was about the Japanese wife that kidnapped the kids. If she ever comes back to USA most likely she will be harassed and most likely jailed by the USA justice system ( police, prosecutors, judges, marshals, jail people) . This problem is temporary for until the kids become of age when they will anyway separate from their parents. USA thinks that it’s justice system is perfect and the rest of the world’s is flawed. Just let the kids be happy and with the next wife the man can be more caring. He can also visit them and make his presence known by sending gifts. All in all is not lost.

If this was about a European or any one else besides an American this wouldn`t be news Either. Epic Fail CNN. 85% of your news is about the united states. Sad really.

Well, the gentleman has apparently broken the law, and without knowing any details of his particular case it is impossible to justify his actions. As far as Japanese laws are concerned, the country enjoys 97% crime solvency rates, versus around 19% in the USA. Domestic abuse is a problem in every society, but there is hardly an indication of its predominance in Japan.

Did the father get the Japanese citizenship for a free medical care for his heart ailment? Or was it the mother’s idea to keep him and the kids under the Japanese law, in which case she is a smarter and more fit parent I must say.

CNN Japan site reveals some facts and the other side of the story which caught my attention. Mr. Savoie and the ex- wife is still legally married in Japan since they never filed for divorce in Japan. Japanese police discovered that Mr. Savoie has been Naturalized in Japan since 4years ago and therefore this case is dealt as married couple and the father trying to abduct children from their country.Both children hold Japanese passports.These facts were never discussed on American news.

also, on the talks about american v japans society and their laws, the crime rate here is almost nil in compairison to the US so abduction, even if the american laws said they were your children is a serious offense. also if this news were televised in japan or put in the news papers, it would be the american, mr savoie who is portraid as the criminal because he tried to take the children from the mother, who has sole custody, so if your asking for news coverage you would be asking for another bad light to be shinned on america

I am a Japanese. You are so right about one thing, “invading into the domicile is considered taboo” in Japan. I can’t even believe that picure of his kids and his ex-wife is exposed to the world and being controberted behind their back. I think Japan have many things to learn from other countries, but we have to respect different culture. As to this case, the problem is that they got divorced.Why dovorce rate is high in the States?I hope Japan and U.S. will work together to bring back quiet life to these kids.

Dad held in failed bid to snatch kids (Fukuoka, Japan)

Since this story has been all over CNN and other major news sources, I wasn't sure what to add. But Dastardly readers may find this account from the Japan Times interesting in illuminating the Japanese point of view on this case. Obviously, we're talking about the case of custodial dad CHRISTOPHER JOHN SAVOIE (he was given full custody by our good ol' boy friends in Tennessee after Mom left with the kids for Japan. She had custody before then.) I have highlighted some of the important points in bold. I'm sure the Fathers Rights people are just furious that there are still a few countries left in this world that honor mothers and haven't caved in to the FR agenda.

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20091001a2.html

Thursday, Oct. 1, 2009

American held in failed bid to snatch own kids
The Associated Press

An American father on a mission to reclaim his young children in Japan was arrested for allegedly abducting them while they were walking to school with his ex-wife, officials said Wednesday.

Christopher John Savoie snatched his two children — an 8-year-old boy and 6-year-old girl — by force early Monday in Fukuoka, said Akira Naraki, a police spokesman in the city.

"He shoved them into a car and drove away," Naraki said.

Savoie, 38, was arrested by police as he tried to enter the U.S. Consulate in Fukuoka with the kids, said Tracy Taylor, a spokeswoman at the consulate.

He was arrested after his ex-wife, Noriko, alerted the police.

The divorced couple and the two children were living in Tennessee, but Noriko Savoie came to Japan with the two children in August without informing her ex-husband, Taylor said.

Custody battles between Japanese mothers and foreign husbands are not uncommon in Japan, which has not yet signed the 1980 Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. The aim of the convention is to standardize laws to ensure custody decisions can be made by the appropriate courts and to preserve access rights for both parents.

Japan has argued that refusing to sign the Hague Convention has helped shield Japanese women and their children from abusive foreign husbands.

In Japan, if a couple gets divorced, one parent — normally the mother — often wins sole custody of the children.

Taylor said officials at the U.S. Consulate have made two visits to Savoie, who now has American and Japanese lawyers. His Japanese lawyer could not be contacted immediately.