After blogging about these kinds of articles for five plus years, it sickens me to see the same crap repeated again and again. Even next to the facts!
The analysis by Peter Jaffe is correct and spot on.
Then what happens? The idiotic reporter describes the relationship between the parents as "volatile" (like a fire?) when IN FACT what you have is a documented history of domestic violence BY the father AGAINST the mother. This was not a case of two "volatile" people or a "volatile relationship." it was a case of a "volatile" violent man. Let's be absolutely clear about that.
And all the charges were "dismissed" by the authorities who consistently refuse to take violence against women seriously, or the tremendous risks that women take in trying to prosecute. But the reporter doesn't go into that either.
So what do they do next? They give the violent abuser joint custody. They CONTINUE TO DO THIS long after the evidence has shown that giving abusers any custodial rights just continues the trauma of women and children and continues the abusive behavior.
This, as critics have repeatedly pointed out for YEARS, is not a "tragedy." Tragedy is a sad conclusion coming about through fate or some random act of the Gods. This is FARCE. Freaking bloody FARCE. The likely outcome to these HUMAN DECISIONS is absolutely predictable, yet the authorities make the same stupid evil decisions again and again and again.
And guess what? A quick search showed that no other news article even MENTIONS that this was a case of a violent man getting child custody. NOT ONE. And that's another way this evil keeps getting perpetuated. Guess what? If you give violent parents access to child victims, the violent parents will continue to be violent. This is not rocket science, folks.
Dad is identified as TRENT SPENCER BUTT.
See the Killer Dads and Custody List for Canada.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/parents-kill-children-why-1.3555456
Parents who kill their children: Why would someone do the unthinkable?
Experts say dads typically do it out of revenge, mental breakdowns most common for moms
By Terry Roberts, CBC News
Posted: Apr 28, 2016 4:11 PM NT| Last Updated: Apr 29, 2016 2:54 PM NT
Five-year-old Quinn Butt died in Carbonear early Sunday, and police allege her death came at the hands of her father, Trent Spencer Butt.
The troubling allegation against Trent Spencer Butt is gut-wrenching, and brings with it a host of sobering and painful questions.
Most notably, why would a parent kill his or her own child? Their own flesh and blood?
That's a question being asked by many throughout Newfoundland and Labrador following an unfathomable tragedy in Carbonear on Sunday.
Police believe 37-year-old Trent Butt killed his five-year-old daughter Quinn and then set fire to his modern home on a quiet street in the Conception Bay North town.
He faces charges of first-degree murder and arson, but neither charge has been proven in court.
Dads a greater threat
Experts have long tried to understand why fathers and mothers commit filicide, the term used when a parent kills their own child.
The answer is difficult to come by, but it's clear that dads are more likely to kill children than moms.
That's the case about 60 per cent of the time, says Peter Jaffe, a professor in the faculty of education at Western University in Ontario.
Research also shows that when dads kill their children, they typically do it out of revenge after a partner has left the relationship, and there is usually a history of domestic violence, said Jaffe.
"The way for the father to get back at the mother for getting out of the relationship is to kill the thing that is most precious to her, which is her child or children," Jaffe told the St. John's Morning Show on Thursday.
Moms typically kill infants
Jaffe said mothers who commit filicide tend to do so following a mental health breakdown, such as postpartum depression, and their victims tend to be younger, usually an infant.
He said fathers typically kill offspring that are older.
"You're dealing with extreme circumstances," noted Jaffe, but he said these cases are rarely out of the blue.
A host of tell-tale signs — prior history of domestic violence, actual or pending separation, depression, stalking and threats — are usually noticed by family, friends and frontline professionals such as social workers and police.
"In Ontario when we find a child killed by a parent, on average there's nine different professionals that have been involved in some way … in the prior years leading up to the homicide," he said.
Because filicide is something most people can't even comprehend, Jaffe said many don't know what to do when they see the warning signs.
He said research shows that greater public awareness is needed, and those close to a situation should encourage a troubled parent to seek help.
"It's essential that the community gets involved. You've often heard that it takes a village to raise a child, well it also take a village to protect a child."
A strained relationship
Firefighters rescued Trent Butt from certain death. He's now in serious condition, but is expected to live. Desperate efforts to save Quinn were unsuccessful.
The tragedy followed the marriage breakup of Quinn's parents, and a custody sharing arrangement that sources say was strained.
Court documents also show the relationship between Butt and his estranged wife was volatile, with Butt charged with three separate counts of assault against the mother dating back to 2013 and 2014. All three charges were dismissed.
The tragedy has rekindled dark memories of the death of Zachary Turner 13 years ago.
The 13-month-old and his mother, Shirley Turner, both died after the mother committed murder-suicide by walking into Conception Bay in August 2003.
Turner was facing extradition to the United States on a charge that she killed her former lover two years prior.