Needless to say, it's an UNNAMED DAD. Notice how this lazy deadbeat, er, "stay-at-home," abused his daughter for years. And when the girl told Mom, Mom told the local child protective agency, which did NOTHING. They "allowed" Daddy to stay in the home, while Mom (of course) was obliged to continue supporting his pedo @$$. He abused the girl for another four years, and threatened that SHE would "destroy" the family if she told.
Seriously, what could this mom have done? Without some official recognition of his sexual abuse, he would have been assured of receiving primary custody as the "primary parent" had she divorced him.
Now this creepy piece of sh** says he's sorry, but the first thing he does when he gets out on bail (!), is get inside a car with his four kids again--after he was (finally) was ordered to have no contact! And check this out: Daddy looks forward to coaching children's hockey some day. WTF? Oh, and notice how Dadddy blames his actions on "anger" over ongoing "marital discord." So he takes no responsibility at all for his own crap. Such a surprise.
Somebody needs to hand this perv a serious reality check. Unfortunately, that doesn't happen in Canada anymore. Nope, what we see is a consistent pattern of minimalizing paternal sexual abuse, and catering to these perverts' every whim and delusion.
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/father-jailed-for-abusing-daughter-132223563.html
Father jailed for abusing daughter
Sex assaults started when girl was four
By: Mike McIntyre
Posted: 10/20/2011 1:00 AM
A Manitoba father has been sentenced to five-and-a-half years in prison for repeatedly sexually abusing his young daughter.
The man, who can't be named to protect the identity of the victim, admits forcing the girl to commit sexual acts on him beginning when she was just four years old while living in their home just east of Winnipeg.
"She once timed (the sexual assault) as lasting through an entire episode of SpongeBob SquarePants," provincial court Judge Tim Preston said during this week's sentencing hearing.
The girl told her mother following the first incident in 2007, triggering an investigation by Child and Family Services. However, the child protection agency ruled there was "inconclusive" evidence of wrongdoing and allowed the accused to remain in the home with his children and wife, who continued to support him.
The accused was a stay-at-home father who cared for their four young children, all under the age of six, while his wife worked full-time, court was told. After being cleared by CFS, he resumed the pattern of abuse for nearly four more years until the girl told her mother again, when she was eight.
Police were brought in this time and a formal statement was taken from the victim. She told investigators her father had been telling her to keep quiet about what he was doing to her, otherwise "Daddy will be taken away in handcuffs," and she would be responsible for destroying the family.
Upon his arrest, the girl began blaming herself and even asked an officer "How do you fix me to get this out of my head?"
She has difficulty sleeping, trusting others and has shown "boundary issues," according to a victim report tendered with the court.
"She obviously has a long period of healing ahead," Preston said. "This was a gross abuse of parental trust. Rather than nurturing her, (the accused) was ensnaring her in his perversion."
The accused wrote a letter of apology to his daughter following his October 2010 arrest, telling her, "It's clearly not your fault." He was released on bail, only to be rearrested weeks later after getting caught inside a vehicle with his four children when under court order not to have any unsupervised contact.
The man has been in custody for the past 11 months and is undergoing sexual-offender treatment and counselling. He told justice officials he plans to support his family financially -- from a distance -- upon release from custody and hopes to one day coach children's hockey. That revelation immediately raised a red flag with the judge.
"That demonstrates a clear lack of insight," Preston said.
He has no prior criminal history and offered little explanation for his crimes, except to tell police he was angry about ongoing "marital discord." There were no issues with alcohol or drug abuse.
The accused was seeking a much lighter jail sentence, but Preston agreed with the Crown's request.
www.mikeoncrime.com
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 20, 2011 A8