More information on the case posted directly below.
This is making less and less sense. Why is Daddy's "roommate" taking the hit here? If the whole point behind this home invasion was dad JOHN TEK's "custody battle" --in reality, a vicious attempt to eliminate this child's mother (who is NEVER identified as the mother, but only as a "woman") and obtain full control of "his" child (but not "her" child?)--then why is Daddy looking at nothing but disorderly conduct and criminal trespassing charges? What interest would the "roommate" have in shooting Daddy's ex--especially if he's just a "roommate"? And are you going to try to tell me that Daddy was just an innocent bystander in all this while two people were shot? Don't think so. The "roommate" looks like nothing more than the muscle guy who was brought along at Daddy's behest, to do a job. So why is Tek not looking at felony kidnapping and attempted murder charges when it seems clear that his child custody "agenda" was behind all this? Why are the police kissing up to this guy? A little fathers rights movement influence here?
http://gazettextra.com/news/2010/nov/26/two-critical-janesville-shooting/
Janesville man arrested in child custody shooting
Posted: Nov 26, 2010 9:47 AM ESTUpdated: Nov 26, 2010 9:47 AM EST
JANESVILLE (WREX) - A Janesville man faces attempted homicide charges after firing several shots at people inside a home during a custody battle.
Samuel Morrow, 25, is charged with two counts of attempted first degree intentional homicide. Police say Morrow went with his roommate, John Tek, to 407 South High Street to take custody of Tek's child from a woman at the home.
Police say the two men went into the home without permission and got into an argument with a man inside the home. Tek left the home with his child, but before Morrow left the home he's accused of firing several shots through the front door. Those shots hit Eileen Than in the head and Robert Bowman in the back. Both victims remain in critical condition.
Tek, 27, is charged with disorderly conduct and criminal trespass.