Custodial dad CLINTON HART claims he was entirely ignorant of the abuse his live-in girlfriend was perpetrating against his 4-year-old daughter. Had he been a mother--and the abuser been a live-in boyfriend--nobody would take these ignorance claims seriously for two seconds. A little pro-daddy bias? Plus, notice that Daddy's role in stripping this child of her mother in their "messy divorce" is totally ignored, which was an abuser's move in and of itself. See two of our previous posts here:
http://dastardlydads.blogspot.com/2010/09/custodial-dad-to-stand-trial-for.htmlhttp://dastardlydads.blogspot.com/2010/06/family-wants-death-penalty-for.html
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/50495364-76/hart-daughter-girl-navarro.html.csp
Father pleads not guilty in beating death of his daughter
By stephen hunt
The Salt Lake Tribune
Published Oct 18, 2010 04:36PM
Updated 13 minutes ago Updated Oct 18, 2010 08:24PM
Clinton Hart pleaded not guilty Monday to first-degree felony murder for his part in death of his 4-year-old daughter, who allegedly died at the hands of Hart’s live-in girlfriend.
Salt Lake County prosecutors claim the charge is appropriate because Hart knew Vanessa Hart was being beaten and did nothing to stop it.
Prosecutors had originally charged Hart under a section of the Utah’s homicide statute that implies he had a direct hand in the slaying of his daughter. But following the preliminary hearing, prosecutors filed an amended charging document alleging he had an indirect involvement in the homicide, with child abuse being the underlying crime.
In addition to the murder charge, Hart, 22, is charged with two counts of second-degree felony child abuse.
The girlfriend, Marina Navarro, 21, is charged with aggravated murder, which carries the possibility of the death penalty.
Defense attorney Steven Shapiro had argued last month, following a preliminary hearing, that there was no evidence Hart knew Navarro was physically abusing his daughter. He noted that Hart’s idea of punishment was to make the girl stand in the corner.
And even though Hart gave a pediatrician explanations for the girl’s many bruises and scrapes by describing a number of accidents that did not match the nature of the injuries, Shapiro claimed that was not evidence of Hart’s complicity. Shapiro claimed Hart was simply distraught and “racking his brains” for some explanation of what had happened to his daughter.
But Boyden, who presided over the preliminary hearing, said she was persuaded that Hart was “very involved” in Navarro’s attempts to discipline the girl. The judge noted that Navarro frequently called or texted Hart for advice on what to do when the girl misbehaved.
Boyden also noted that, according to testimony, when Hart was called home from work on June 13 by Navarro — who claimed the girl had fallen down the stairs at the couples’ Kearns home — Hart tried to revive her by running cold water across her forehead.
Hart later told police he had used cold water before to bring the girl back to consciousness, suggesting he had knowledge of other serious injuries.