Part of our ongoing survey of what the child abuse and neglect research REALLY says about perpetrators. Perpetrator data is highlighted in bold below.
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=1385624
Journal of Biosocial Science (1980), 12:333-340 Cambridge University Press
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980
doi:10.1017/S0021932000012876
Household composition and the risk of child abuse and neglect
Margo I. Wilsona1, Martin Dalya1 and Suzanne J. Weghorsta2
a1 Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
a2 Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA
Summary
The incidence of child abuse and neglect resulting in validated case reports to the American Humane Association in 1976 was determined in relation to household composition, family income and age of the victim. Abuse and neglect were both maximal in father-only homes and minimal in two-natural-parent homes. Mother-only households exceed those with one natural and one step-parent in neglect incidence, but the reverse is true for abuse incidence. Poverty is more strongly associated with neglect risk than with abuse risk, and probably cannot account for the high risks of abuse and neglect in father-only and step-parent families. Evidence that the presence of an unrelated adult filling a parental role exacerbates the risk of physical abuse is presented and discussed.